Monday, June 29, 2009

Portrait of India Part-2

Portrait of India

India's Liberalization - A Boon or Curse

Part-2

Power Houses of EICs and MNCs for last 400 years

Introduction

As indicated in part-1 it is not easy to find who the owners of EICs till now except three names that come out for public consumption. So we first start by studying the houses that controlled the day to day operations of EICs and the personalities in them and their interrelationships. These operations were, manufacturing, trading, transporting & shipping, warehousing and banking. The houses that controlled these operations were same all across the world where ever the EICs did business. The process of this study will lead to ownership enigma of these EICs and MNCs to London so we study the EIC operations in England it self. Who run the operations in London? With this we can draw a conclusion that, EIC were controlled by only a handful of families not exceeding 20, all related to each other by marriage, analogous to a huge joint family with overlapping economic and commercial interests.

Then in the conclusion we see how even Indian MNCs are controlled by only few of the above houses, thus completing the cycle of economic domination as done by East India Company, in 2003.

Then we study the structure of MNCs and we will see how the same personalities and operational houses of EICs, through their grand children will reappear to be controlling the MNCs after 400 years, thus completing the cycle of domination. What is more glaring is the ideology of EIC and MNC and methodology of domination are same for both of them, appearing as if mirror image of each other. First we study the ideology and methodology of these EICs and MNCs.

EIC ideology and methodology

EIC was a huge trading company. The owners were called ‘merchants of adventure’. Because they are merchants their ultimate motto is profit and maximization of wealth. They never had any other noble objectives than this. As these merchants belong to Judeo-Christian traditions and religions they never believed that their actions have any reaction nor they are responsible for their actions as they never believed in rebirth or theory of karma. This unique philosophical outlook gave them opportunity to trade in such goods like narcotics which can destroy human civilization.

EICs and thus British bought spices, opium, precious metals, and minerals from India. How did they pay for it? They paid for it from the ‘taxes collected from poor Indians’ who paid extremely high taxes even on salt that was naturally available. EICs paid the “taxes collected from Indians” for the “price of the goods” they bought from Indian traders. The taxes are so huge that EICs had a surplus monies left after paying for the goods. This surplus was used to maintain armies of their own to subjugate India. So in an effect British under EIC got every thing from India for ‘Free’. This is the definition of “Free Trade”. When this concept was extended ‘globally’ to all countries it became ‘globalization of Trade’. For example from China they bought silks, tea, and porcelain. How did they pay for it? By opium which they got under ‘free trade’ from India.

The two noble concepts adapted by British and EIC, for which they fought with every body who opposed this concept in the name of ‘defending the Free Trade and Globalization’. This paved way for ruthless exploitation of India for more than 150 years from the clutches of which we came out only 52 years ago due to sacrifices of many great leaders.

Now under Privatization and Liberalization, we were told that MNCs are coming to uplift India to a first world country, and we set a goal of becoming industrialized nation by 2020. So what do MNCs want in return for this upliftment? Liberalize trade. Meaning they should have freedom in deciding as to what to trade in, how to trade in, and where to trade in India. They want to trade in only Diamonds (nobody in India knew that there are trillions of dollars worth of diamond mines in India for last 50 years but MNCs knew), Oil, Natural Gas, Minerals, Fertilizers and Chemicals, Genetically modified products, cosmetics. (Here we are mentioning only few products that they want to deal with. Other minor products we are omitting as inclusion of which makes this part unending). How to trade in them? They want the state monopoly to be broken, privatize every thing in the above fields. Abolish the Indian Monopoly Trade Restrictive Act, so that one or two MNC sponsored companies can buy all the state owned corporations.

The funniest thing is even in America the champion of Liberalized Privatized Free Trade there are an laws called Anti Trust Acts. No single individual or corporation can go to a position of controlling the entire industry so that it can abuse the monopoly power to dictate the political philosophy of USA. Under this act De Beers was not permitted to do business in USA. Also the Giant Standard Oil Corporation was broken in to 10 or so subsidiaries and Giant Bell Corporation was broken in to 15or so smaller baby Bell corporations to allow competition to survive. I just mentioned three corporations above but like that there are many. We see how these corporations above even in America abused the anti trust act to control whole of a particular market in USA. The same corporations now we see want to come to India under liberalization. And these same corporations as we see are the EICs masquerading as MNCs.

MNCs are bringing their capital in to India to invest in the above ventures. Now we are led to believe that this capital is badly needed for infrastructure projects which are essential for India to become a first world country. As they are bringing the capital in, in order to allow them to take their profits out we have now effectively said that any one can take any amount of dollars or any foreign currency out of the country-restrictions of currency outflow are abolished.

Let’s examine. First, if MNCs are bringing the capital needed for the India to develop then why state central governments are contacting billions of dollars of debt from IMF, World Bank, Asian Development Bank etc?

Second, MNCs are buying all state owned profitable manufacturing industries in India. Now where they sell these products? To Indians of course.

Let us take the example of Oil and Natural gas. Till now Indian Government was selling oil for Indians. What ever profit that they were making (after waste and inefficiencies) was used to run the government. Now it was told to us that this form of managing oil companies is inefficient as it creates waste. Waste because of unions, excessive labor, political appointments to these corporations, and political accommodations of party members are draining the resources. To make these firms competitive they ‘have to be sold’ or privatized.

With this sale first, Government will get immediate cash for developmental projects. Second by privatizing, it generates more employment or at lease the employment in these companies will be secured for next 10 years. Let us see how in reality it works.

Now once these industries are privatized these private owners are not going to tolerate inefficiencies. So no more political appointments, nepotism, union influence. Inefficient workers will be given VRS. Then there will be increase in prices to cover the excess costs of development and small profit. With the profits that are made in India what do they do? They buy more industry in India. How long they go on buying? Till each and every economic sector was bought under control.

Once majority of economic sectors were brought under their control then their power becomes abusive that they will dictate what Indians should eat, drink, how to live, how to marry and how to rise children and most importantly whether we should protect ourselves as a nation against aggression or not. In the year 1971 Burma Shell and ESSO[1] denied to supply oil to Indian Army, Navy Air Force, because these companies thought ‘we are doing an unjustified war against our neighbors’. Irritated, the then prime minister nationalized the oil industry to protect our country’s mineral wealth, indigenously develop self sufficiency (swadeshi swaraj) and reduce dependency on Foreign (Videshi) raw material. Now these two oil companies thus nationalized were slated for privatization. These two companies, after government of India took over them, were developed by Indians and now worth more than hundred times the original price of them in 1971. Now these two companies thus taken over and running profitable are slated for sales to the same Burma Shell and ESSO disguising as Royal Dutch Shell and EXXON both in collaboration with Reliance Industries. Meaning the original owners of these two companies waited for 32 years, and are getting 100 times more worth on their investment along with getting their companies once nationalized back in to their hands.

Royal Dutch Shell and Burma Shell are subsidiaries of Shell Corporation controlled by House of Rothschilds centered in London who also controlled the old EICs and the then Bank of England.

EXXON is the name given to one of the companies formed after in 1911, when the original Standard Oil Empire was broken in to smaller units. This entire empire of Standard Oil is controlled by one family the House of Rockefellers, centered in New York. Interestingly Rockefellers and Rothschilds are related to each other as they have a tradition of intermarriages within these two houses.

Names of Standard Oil (Monopoly) before 1911

Ater U.S. Judge Broken Monopoly (after 1911)

Standard Oil Trust (Canadian Oil)

Esso

Standard Oil Co (New Jersey)

Exxon

Standard Oil of Indiana

Mobil

Standard Oil of California

Chevron

Standard Oil of Ohio (Sohio)

Phillips 66

Time Magazine reported in its issue on 18 February 1974 “for 111 years the business that has been variously known as the Standard Oil Trust, Standard Oil Co (New Jersey) ESSO now Exxon has survived wars, expropriations, brutalizing competition, muckraking attacks and even dismemberment by the US supreme court (in 1911). It has not only survived but also grown from a refinery in Cleveland to a global behemoth that sells petroleum to more than 100 countries through some 300 subsidiaries and affiliates to make up the United Nations of “Oil”.”

Now we see the question of national boundaries are myth. Say, if Indians do not like Burma Shell then Royal Dutch Shell will buy Indian oil companies. If we do not like ESSO then EXXON will buy Indian oil companies. If we do not like all the four then Canadian American Oil company will bid for Indian oil. The poor Indian army wants to ban 10 or 15 nations from owing offshore oil fields in India thinking that these countries are our enemies or can damage our national security. But as we saw these companies operate in 100 countries. So the same oil companies will come to India from those 85 countries which are not on the banned list of Indian Army. The crucial thing that Indians need to investigate is the real owners their names-not their agents, proxies, or the corporations belonging to different countries or their pseudo owners-real owner families, their associations with India or EICs.

With this background we now study the EICs and MNCs operatives or controller families. EIC trade as mentioned earlier was divided in to many parts and each part is owned by a particular family. Fro example the growing opium, collecting taxes in India was owned by EIC and its paid officials or after 1837 by the British government it self. But the Trading in opium and other goods were handled in India by house of Sassoon’s. Their distribution in China was handled by House of Jardine and Matheson. The shipping of these goods was handled by House of Inchapes. The gold diamond mining business was handled by house of Openheimers/Rhodes. The American operations were handled by house of Rockefellers, Seagrams, Sassoons, Japhets, Jardine Mathesons etc. The banking aspect of this trade was handled co-ordinated by houses of Rothschilds and Warburgs. Apart form this house of Lloyds, Abes, Astors assisted these operations in insuring the business of EICs. Now even today these houses control the most of the MNCS we see today. We do in depth of study of Rothschilds and Rockefellers and we then at the end give a list of Indian Multi nationals operating only to show how most of these belong to only one single group run by single family which was associated with the EIC owners by either business or marriage.

East India Companies had a unique managerial style. In any particular country all trading, business and commerce were always handed over to one or at the most two business houses. They were given full control over a nation under consideration. From 1800-1947, the House of Sassoons controlled most of the trade within India-banking, trading, shipping, insurance etc from their Mumbai head quarters. Most of them moved out of India to England starting from 1900. MNCs where ever they operated always followed the above rule. They develop a local industrial/business house (India is big so we may encounter more than one such in case of India) and through which they exploit the independent nations. So for people of any nations it is the Industrial house that comes to lime light as exploiter not MNCs. (During EICs the poor zamindars were blamed for exploitation of farmers with huge taxes, where the fact was the British under EIC exploited the farmers). And these business houses will be ready to move out of the country once the MNCs finish their job and leave. At the end of the section we try to show that this unique feature of EICs is retained by MNCs in India under the current wave of liberalization and privatization also. We will try to trace the Modern Equivalent of house of Sassoon at the end of the article.

Controllers and operatives of East India Company and various Multinationals

1. Jardine Mathesons Noble Opium Knights

2. Inchapes-Lords of Seas.

3. House of Sassoons-Masters of India and China

4. Rhodes & Openheimers – African Elite-Monopolists of Gold and Diamonds

5. House of Rockefellers-Princes of North America

6. House of Rothschilds-Uncrowned kings of Europe

1. Jardine & Matheson.

These two names belong to two families who were given full control of smuggling of Indian grown opium in to China during 1800. They were the country traders in opium for EICs. First they used to smuggle opium in to China. After Hongkong was occupied by EIC after first opium war in 1836, J & M set up their trading firm on Hong Kong. With the huge profits generated from Opium trade they diversified in to Insurance, Banking, Gold Trading, international finance. Today they own most of the Hongkong, have offices in USA. The original founders for their noble service, were given knighthood by Queen Victoria (see Rhodes for their industrial ownership). Liberal funding for their operations were given by house of Rothschilds via Bank of England and EIC.

2. House of Inchapes

Inchape Sr who a 125 years before founded Oriental Steam Company in Hongkong which helped to carry tea, spices opium and Chinese Indian coolies/pigs to USA, Caribbean Islands another important commodity of EICs. Inchape Sr also co founded the Hong Shang Clearing House along with Jardine and Matheson which now holds dozen banks and investment houses which became subsequent clearing house for foreign money as investment in to Asian markets, and Inchape Jr sat as board of director (BOD) on both P & O and Hong Shang. Liberal funding for their operations were given by house of Rothschilds via Bank of England and EIC.

3. House of Sassoon

The Sassoon dynasty was rooted in the Turkey Company and to the Venice Company; where we trace the origins of the house of Rothschilds. The house of Sassoons through 30 different corporations and subsidiaries exercised control over trade with India and China. Before they became Barons and Knights they were popularly known as the "opium traders from Baghdad". David Sassoon was born in Baghdad, in 1792, son of Saleh Sassoon, a wealthy banker and the treasurer to Ahmet Pasha, governor of Baghdad (making him the "court Jew" -- a highly influential position). When Ahmet was overthrown for corruption in 1829, the Sassoons fled to Bombay, India, the strategic trade route to India and gateway to the Far Eastern trade. Soon the British government granted Sassoon "monopoly rights" to manufacture cotton goods, silk and most importantly, Opium -- at that time the most addictive drug in the world! The Jewish Encyclopedia of 1905, states that Sassoon expanded his opium trade into China and Japan. He placed his eight sons in charge of the major opium exchanges in China. According to the 1944 Jewish Encyclopedia: "He employed only Jews in his business, and wherever he sent them he built synagogues and schools for them. He imported whole families of fellow Jews . . . and put them to work." The House of Sassoon was in Mumbai area, but subsequently moved back to England early 1900; Sassoon docks in Mumbai are named after them. They became affiliated by intermarriage with both French and English houses of Rothschilds. The first such marriage occurred in 1881. Since 1832, the family broadened its sphere from Baghdad to Mumbai there after to China, Japan and the entire Orient.

A few of the companies they owned were the British Burma Petroleum, (and probably Burma Shell which was nationalized in 1971 for refusing to supply oil to Indian Army) Bank of China, Eastern Bank, Imperial Bank of Persia and probably Imperial bank of India. The Sassoons controlled the Banking and trading part of the East India Company. The control of the production of opium was in the hands of the British East India Company itself. The British East India Company was the military enforcer of this production. The distribution of Opium per-se was taken care of by various traders, the most important being Jardine-Matheson and company. They were reporting to the Rothschilds, and were also related to the Rothschilds. (We ask more Indians to research this issue.) During the beginning of 20th century the House of Sassoons moved to London. How many companies this house still controls in India after independence under various holdings and proxies is a topic of research in itself.

4. Houses of Rhodes & Openheimers – African Elite-Monopolists of Gold and Diamonds

Historians, common people, leaders and opponents shudder with fear when they hear these two names in African continent. 250 years of virtual and ruthless exploitation of the continent, division and subversion of every government that stood against the diamond and gold conglomerates, human toil, sorrow, sweat and tears continuing even to this day, all started in 1853 the year when Cecil Rhodes was born. He studied at oxford and when he graduated, his talent was spotted and hand picked by house of Rothschild. He started his business ventures in South Africa with unlimited financial support of House of Rothschilds, and was the founder of Anglo American gold fields and consolidated gold fields. He also was the founder of De Beers Consolidated mines which is the single largest producer of Diamonds. [India was the largest diamond exporter till 1875. After the last piece of valuable diamond was robbed out of India by British merchants from the Rajas and Maharajas and sultans there were no diamond exports from India]. Africa for 200 years starting from 1800 was the leading diamond producing continent and De Beers was and is the number one diamond procuring and supplying corporation. With unlimited resources from Rothschilds, De beers slowly swallowed all small diamond mining companies using the same strategies as John D Rockefeller (see part 5) used to gobble up oil companies. Various trusts and subsidiaries were formed to conceal true identity of De Beers (Indian diamond mines are given to an Australian company which is a subsidiary of De Beers in collaboration with Reliance Corporation). Hundreds of offshore banking and trading posts were opened in the names of numbered companies. The same suit was followed by the Anglo American Gold fields and Consolidated gold fields. Every gold and diamond mine in the world was either by force or military might of British Empire was taken by these two companies across all continents and nations [except Russia, India]. During this process especially in Africa and Latin America, De Beers financed the governments and rebels alike. No matter who is in power the Diamonds mines are for ever belong to De Beers. Identifying these ruthless strategies and the monopoly that De Beers enjoyed in Diamond Trading the United States government banned it from doing business in United States. Even today this ban is there on De Beers. But the De Beers’ shops are set up in Canada and still virtually every diamond sold in US comes from De Beers and its traders and in the United States these traders are by rule Hassidic (orthodox) Jewish merchants.

From destroying Natal Province to mass destruction of democracies in Katanga and other countries in Africa to the Recent millions of refuge slaughter in Rwanda, Angola, Congo, to the Sierra Leon carnage it is De Beers that is behind every event. Though the characters and corporations looked multinational and looked different they are either linked to or proxies of De Beers.

After the death of Rhodes the De Beers was taken directly by Rothschilds via their N.M. Rothschild & Co and official supervision was done by Openheimer Family. It was this vast concentration of diamond and gold production by this company came under intensive investigation by various European authorities since 1900 and now it is believed that gold and diamonds are used as a means to launder the vast fortunes and sums earned in opium drug and narcotic smuggling, which is controlled as previously described by various associates of Jardine Matheson, Sassoons and associates linked to Rothschilds.

As EICs controlled the silver mines of South America by destroying Native Indian civilizations to pay for opium of India and Tea of China, so too these MNCs now control gold and diamonds needed for the payment of opium grown in Asia and Far East.

Investigative authorities believe that the Asian (Golden Crescent -Iran Afghanistan and Pakistan) and far eastern (golden Triangle-Burma, China, Thailand) opium its derivatives and marijuana trade worth $ 500 billions, is entirely financed by the gold and diamond smuggling rings connected to De Beers. They reported that 400-600 tons of smuggled gold is absorbed in Asian Markets and the conduits were the associates of Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank that operates in various countries. As the farmers in golden Triangle and Crescent accept payment for opium only in gold and diamonds it is imperative to secure this mode of payment so that there exists a monopoly on this trade. Next important thing is, the payments and bank transfers in the form of any currency can be traced but the gold and diamonds cannot be traced.

Today’s Honk Kong’s gold market is wholly run by Sharps Pixel and Ward a 51% owned subsidiary of Hang Shang the parent company of Hong Kong Shanghai Bank, and is owned by Jardine & Matheson. The second conduit for illegal gold operations is Sheikdom of Dubai. The operations of the Dubai gold market are controlled by British Bank of Middle East-a 100% subsidiary of Hong Kong and Shanghai bank. The far eastern legal and illegal trade is controlled from Macao Islands (officially belong to Portuguese, but leased to Chinese on a two year term contracts), and is supervised by directly Hong Kong Shanghai Bank.

According to official intelligence reports the PRC (People Republic of China) entered this legal and illegal tradeoff Gold Smuggling in 1950, after Mao took over power as per the agreements between the PRC and the international bankers-precisely Jardine & Matheson, so that in case of fear of caught up by any government they can summarily blame Hong Kong Smugglers, who in turn blame Macao island brokers who in turn blame Chinese government.

But Chinese government involvement in this trade via Pao San & Co and Kan Kuam Tsing Company and other thirteen communist banks which are permitted to trade directly with Hong Kong Banks. This continuation of the gold diamond and drug trade un interruptedly is the basis and reason for British government or ADAE supporting Mao Tse Tung and his communist brothers[2]. In to this tightly controlled market the gold flows (official channels) from Philippines and Australia and New Zealand. But the un official 400 tons of Gold comes from what officials describe as London Gold Pool. This pool is controlled by the same families which were involved in drug running operations since 175 years from now.

Cecil Rhodes Anglo American and Consolidated Gold Fields, and De Beers along with the five following biggest London gold trading firms control the gold market. The first of which is the Sharps Pixley which owns the remaining 49 % (Hong Kong Shanghai bank owns 51 % of the Sharp Pixley and Ward) of the Sharp Pixley and Ward, the Hong Kong Gold Trading firm. But Sharp Pixley it self is a fully owned subsidiary of London Merchant Bank Kleinwort Benson, which has interlocking Directorships with Rio Tinto Zinc. RioTinto Zinc is another metal trading firm belonging to Matheson Family.

The Second gold trading firm is Mocatta Metals (this Mocatta family was one of the owners of Bank of England and East India Company) which is owned by Hong Kongs’s Standard Chartered Bank. In its original form Standard Bank was found by Cecil Rhodes. These two banks Standard Chartered and Hong Kong Shanghai Bank have tightly interlocked directorships from the days of British opium trade. The Mocatta Metals has its American Operation under the name of Mocatta and Goldsmid.

According to European intelligence agencies the then Chairman of Mocatta Metals (1974) Dr. Henry Jarecki has been under investigation for many years for illegal activities. According to European intelligence Jarecki dirty laundered money goes to fund Mossad’s (Israel’s intelligence agency that protect the interests of Israelis all over the world) foreign intelligence operations mainly in New York. According to intelligence half of the gold traders of this firm started from the same Psychological Department of Harvard University.

The third largest gold pool firm is Samuel Montague (this family also one of the owners of Bank of England and East India Company) whole subsidiary of Midland Bank which owns 20 % owner ship of Standard and Chartered Bank. And interestingly Sir Mark Turner who was a Deputy Chairman of Kleinwort Benson Merchant Bank and director of Midland Bank and Samuel Montagu is also the Chairman of Rio Tinto Zinc. Montagu Family is heavily married (blood relatives) with Rothschilds dynasty.

The fourth player is the Johnson Matthey owners have interlocked directorships with the south African gold producers Consolidated Gold Fields, and Anglo American Gold fields which control 90 % of the out put of gold in Africa.

The fifth biggest gold pool firm is none other than N.M. Rothschilds & co. As we know they own the remaining of the four above and financed many of the ventures of Jardine Matheson and Cecil Rhodes. Every day even today all these 5 London gold Pool firms meet in London at the trading Room of N.M. Rothschilds & Co, on St. Swithin St, New Court London, to set that day’s price for gold for the world.

The second empire that Cecil Rhodes created is the Diamond business. Which is also according to European intelligence agencies heavily involved in drug money laundering? The world diamond market and its operations were and are controlled by single firm De Beers. Though it was created by Cecil Rhodes it is now controlled by Rothschild’s associate family Oppenheimer’s family (recently there was a reshuffle in the board). Harry Oppenheimer was the chairman of De Beers. He is also the chairman of the Anglo American gold Fields, the larger South African Gold producer. 85% of the Diamond whole sale market is run by De Beers, 10% of this run by trading houses in Hong Kong. Rest of the 5 % of the diamond market is from Russia and they sell most of their diamonds through Bank of England, family bank of Rothschilds. Hong Kong Diamond operation is handled by De Beers through its Israeli and Jewish connections. According intelligence sources the diamonds whose small size and great value makes the perfect vehicle for payment for international trafficking in heroin cocaine and opium. For this trafficking, intelligence reports that De Beers uses the expatriate services of Jewish merchant net works. There is little information of both diamond and heroine trade and value of trade to intelligence agencies. As far as diamonds are concerned the Central Selling Organization (CSO) which wholesales 85% of the Diamonds is wholly owned by De Beers.

Every year at ten “sights” only 300 clients’ purchase diamonds form De Beers. The list of the clients and the locations of the auction is the best kept secret. After the purchase the diamonds were sent to two main cutting locations one in Antwerp, Belgium, and one in Ashqelon, Israel. Antwerp’s Diamond cutting and other related trades were financed by Banque Bruxelles-Lambert, controlled by Lambert family, the Belgium cosines of Rothschilds. Israel’s and New York’s trade is financed by Bank Leumi of Israel.

Within these individual centers (sights) traders trade among themselves. Then these trades move to Diamond exchanges like New York diamond Dealers Club (remember De Beers is not allowed to trade or operate business in United States, so it has to use clandestine Jewish merchant networks) or Ramat Glan in Tel Aviv, and the Antwerp Diamond Bourse. No written records are kept of any transactions on these exchanges. None of the deals were allowed any scrutiny under any law enforcement agencies even under American Law until the diamonds reach retail Jewelry Stores.

Hong Kong diamond market is virtual monopoly of the Union Bank of Israel. This bank is wholly owned subsidiary of biggest finance house Bank Leumi. Bank Leumi is a subsidiary of Barclays Bank on whose board Sir Oppenheimer and his family sits. Bank Leumi’s own chairman is Earnest Japhet, whose fortunes were derived from the official EICs opium trade with USA in 19th century. Barclays bank according to intelligence reports not only is the parent company of Bank of Leumi, but also owns the family bank of Japhets, The Charterhouse Japhet and controls the second largest commercial bank of Israel, Isreal Discount house, which is in the orbit of House of Rothschilds. These families Inchapes, Japhets, Arlies, Rothschilds, Jardine and Matheson firmly locked up with intermarriages and it appears that the merchant banking and drug narcotic trade is done by single close knit joint family. For example Schroeder Bank’s chairman the tenth Earl (belonging to Inchape family) is brother-in-law of the chairman of ADF Lloyd, of Lloyd’s bank and the giant insurance corporation. Lloyd’s grand fathers are leading partners of Kuhn and Loeb an American investment firm associated with Rockefeller, Morgan and Rothschild. Interestingly the Mother In law of Sir Winston Churchill comes from the Arlie family.

The vast fortunes of this diamond markets are shared not only by few families but at retail level it is shared by Anglo-Jewish networks world wide except in India where this market is controlled by traditional communities of Swanker and Janis). For example in New York this market is controlled mainly by members of Hasidic Jewish sects resident in this area.

It is this power and virtual monopoly of ADAE on gold and diamond that created much trouble in Africa. Where ever diamond mines spotted it has to be mined by De Beers. This un satiable thrust for supply and distribution monopoly which was resisted by the tiny African Republics as they want to use these national assets for their development. As Rothschilds and Rockefeller’s Oil trading companies in Middle East owns 100 % oil wells and pays these corrupt Arab states pennies over a dollar as royalty which becomes billions for these sheiks who spend lavishly these fortunes. Depending on the tastes of Arab countries these oil companies belong to may nations (Canadian, Dutch, British, American but in the end they are all one). Any Arab state that do not wants to sell oil to this consortium and want to sell independently was and is a terrorist state, (Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Ethiopia, Somalia etc) and UN[3] will be bank rolled to enforce no sell zones in these countries. So too De Beers (under different countries diamond corporations) controls every diamond mine in Africa. If a small country does not want to fall in the game then, rebellions within the country are supported (Sierra Leone Nigeria, Congo), if that does not work, ethnic strife is supported within and from neighboring countries (Rwanda, Congo, Zaire), if still that does not work the UN will be bank rolled and under the charter of the UN the colonial European Governments (Britain, Belgium, Australia and USA) will send their troops (Rwanda-Belgium), (Katanga in 1962, Belgium USA and British). Belgium and Netherlands is a special case here. Belgium and Netherlands kings were interrelated through marriage. Netherlands (called Dutch) queen Juliana Beatrix is 49% owner of royal Dutch Shell, and the remaining 51% owner of Royal Dutch Shell is none other than the Rothschilds and their Dutch Cousins.

Cecil Rhodes funded political parties across nations, had the following of parliamentarians both in England and South Africa and finally became the prime minister of Cape colony. His personal spending around 1890 was around Million pounds sterling per month. Part of his vast fortune billions of pounds that were exploited from South Africa was invested in creating Rhodes scholarship in Oxford University. Rhodes created and funded many other social science departments in Cambridge and Oxford. But the Rhodes scholarships were specifically designed to recruit individuals from all around the world to transform them in to the respective national leaders by grooming them as anglophiles. Most of Indian leaders were studied in Oxford or Cambridge.

Rhodes believed in Anglo Saxon Superiority (ADAE superiority) and believed that United States must be subjugated to the superior Anglo Saxon race. His objective was only this Anglo Saxon (ADAE) can rule the world as they are the chosen people by god. This is to be achieved through powerful economic domination of all sovereign nations and their economies. But the different national political leadership has to be conducive for this purpose. So an enormous Anglophile propaganda is created which strip the world from its cultural diversity and national integrity via education, research and creating ideas especially in the national leaders and leading academicians via scholarships, grants, education assistance programs which tend to be pro Anglophile.

5. House of Rockefellers

Everything about Rockefellers seems to be mythical. One story states that they came from a family of French Protestants (thus they can easily tie up with the southern Baptists-American protestants, President Bush is a southern Baptist. In fact these two interests joined hands in the economic exploitation of Latin America). But a distinguished biographer Dr. Malcolm Stern established that the claim of many Jews that Rockefeller is one of their own is a true fact.[4] John D. Rockefeller who always believed that competition was a sin was sent in 1859 to Titusville Pennsylvania to check whether there is any use in the gushing black liquid in the wells of the town. At that time John decided to take control of production transportation and refining of the oil industry in to his hands. He started the first oil company of his empire Standard Oil (ESSO). It was one among the 27 refineries at those times. Within one year all 25 other competitors became bankrupt and the entire oil refining in Pennsylvania came under the control of Rockefeller. This is achieved with the discriminatory rail and road transport pricing that was granted for John D by the Harriman rail road company (who controlled the entire Rail Industry of USA. Harriman and Rockefeller both were financed in their ventures by the house of Rothschild to cooperate with each other to take control of US industrial infrastructure under Free Trade.)

In the words of Mathew Josephson’s classic text The Robber Barons, he states “…where the standard oil could not carry on its expansion by peaceful means, it was ready with violence”. In his study The rich and the Super Rich, Ferdinand Lundberg observed “ as the history of Standard Oil by any author, pro or con, clearly shows, Rockefeller was of a deeply conspiratorial, scheming nature, always planning years ahead with a clarity of vision that went far beyond anything any of his associates had to offer.” One Cleveland Oil refiner went to Peru in Latin America in 1880 to buy oil from there, only to find the entire Peru oil interests were bought by a company which was a subsidiary of Anglo-American company of England, which is a subsidiary of Standard oil. By 1890 Standard oil was refining almost 90 % of all crude oil of United States.

Trusts and Trustees

The expanding growth in oil industry and the subsequent monopolistic practices by John D are bound to be examined by the U.S. Tax authorities. So By 1900 with a missionary zeal Paul Warburg in charge of Rothschild’s interests in Germany and the engine behind the creation of French and German central banks, came to United States to push with missionary zeal the promotion of Central bank and creation of Trusts. Though the idea of Central bank did not took off until late 1920s trust act was formed in the beginning of 1900. Under trust act, one can incorporate as many trusts, family, public, charitable trusts and can transfer owner ship of any company to the trust. As trusts are for philanthropic purposes they are exempt from taxes. Trusts own the properties and the administrators of trusts are trustees who are none other than owners of the corporations that were transferred to the trusts. Trusts are managed by managers for the trustees. Thus for all practical purposes we see only managers but may never know who are the real owners. Things get further complicated when trusts start owning trusts. In this case the owner is a trust also. As trusts also have perpetual entity as corporations mere giving a trust name is enough than the real owner’s name. It is this multiple trust ownership that hides the real corporate owners, as holding companies hide the real owners of subsidiaries. Once trust act was passed Standard Oil became Standard oil Trust. Along with the trust act came anti trust laws limiting the trust control that lead to monopoly over certain segments of economy. This hurdle was however overcome by creating multiple trusts and layers of trust ownerships.

By 1911 under intense public pressure Judge Kebesaw Mountain Landis ordered Standard Oil be broken in to smaller units to encourage competition. John D created new foundations and trusts and gave away his stock to them. The net effect was the same. It is like taking money from the personal account keeping in a family trust. You do not own money but the trust owns it and you are the trustee.

Names of Standard Oil (Monopoly) before 1911

Ater U.S. Judge Broken Monopoly (after 1911)

Standard Oil Trust (Canadian Oil)

Esso

Standard Oil Co (New Jersey)

Exxon

Standard Oil of Indiana

Mobil

Standard Oil of California

Chevron

Standard Oil of Ohio (Sohio)

Phillips 66

It is the beginning of the tip of the iceberg of Rockefeller control over oil industry. For example Exxon which is the 9 largest of the American corporations shares only 16 % of oil production and 32 % sales revenue from United States. Its Transportation fleet includes 155 own oil tankers (this was broken in to a commercial fleet Corporation recently to reduce costs). According to a recent study [5] “Exxon alone controlled 321 other oil corporations, including Humble Oil and Venezuela’s (fourth largest oil producing country) Creole Petroleum, themselves among the largest corporations in the world”.

But surprisingly oil business is not at all the biggest business of Rockefellers. That great honor is always reserved to banking Establishment. The family banks of Rockefeller’s are the First National City Bank, and Chase Manhattan Bank. Chase Manhattan is created by the union of Rockefeller owned Chase Bank with Kuhn, Loeb controlled Manhattan bank. In 1971 Chase Manhattan Claimed $ 31 billion dollars in assets. But this does not include the banking business carried by the affiliated banks of Chase overseas which it need not consolidated on their US balance sheets. According to Time Magazine “the Chase has 28 branches of its own, but more important, it has a globe encircling string of 50,000 correspondent banking offices”. If each of these correspondent banks is worth $ 10 million dollars in business assets linked with Chase then this gives whopping $ 500 billion dollars assets to Chase worldwide[6]. It is the only bank that has a special envoy to the United Nations[7]. It is these banks that provide capital for IMF, ADB, and WB.

During Senate confirmation hearings for vice Presidency, Nelson Rockefeller Stated that “I do not own any shares in the Chase Manhattan bank” However he neglected to mention his family owns 623,000 shares or 2.54% of the Chase Stock. He also overlooked that Rockefeller brothers Fund owns another 148,000 Chase shares, and Rockefeller University owns another 81,296 shares. But this meager 4 % controlling ownership means nothing. “Even when banks in United States were required by law to disclose largest stock holders, as was the case in the 1962 Patman investigation of chain banking, they have used what is called street names in referring the stockholdings in trust. These street names are solely fictitious and bear no resemblance to the actual beneficiary or trustees. In the case of Chase Manhattan it is reported twenty largest stockholders in 1962 included fifteen street names like Dudd & Co, Don & co, Atwell & Co, etc.”[8] In these trusts “...most of the owners are part of the Rockefeller Empire”.[9]

The next most important bank in the empire of Rockefeller Empire is their family bank, National City bank of New York which later became Citi bank and now Called Citi Group. Now City bank surpasses mighty Chase in total assets. The third bank in their orbit is Chemical bank owned by Harkness family, who is also the largest stock holder of Standard oil trust.

These gigantic banks are the source of short and medium term financing for the uncrowned kings and their men. But the long term financing comes from Insurance companies. Rockefeller banks have heavily interlocked ownership with three of the four biggest life insurance corporations, Metropolitan Life, Equitable Life, and New York Life. According to Professor Knowles Rockefeller group controlled 25% of all the assets of the fifty largest commercial banks and 30 % of all the assts of the fifty largest insurance companies.

1974 Senate Banking Committee stated that in a public corporation more than 5% control tantamount to control. If you want to consider those firms where Rockefellers have more than 10 % stock through family trusts, and unknown percentage of stock via their own banks and insurance companies and at least two or three top management positions in each belonging to their chosen people then the following is the list of the corporations that they own. Right next to the corporation the asset size ranking in 1975 by Fortune magazine is also given.

Corporation Name

Ranking by Fortune magazine About the size of Asset Holding

Corporation Name

Ranking by Fortune magazine About the size of Asset Holding

Exxon

1

Standard oil of California

6

Mobil

5

Standard oil of Indiana

13

International Harvester

26

Inland Steel

78

Marathon Oil

60

Quaker Oats

163

IBM

9

Wheeling Pittsburgh Steel

194

Texaco

4

AT & T *

10

Westinghouse

19

Boeing

39

International Paper

56

Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing

59

Sperry Rand

70

Xerox

41

National Cash Register

97

National Steel

64

American Home Products

92

Pfizer

130

Avon

159

Merck

152

Penn Central

T-3 **

TWA

T-1

Eastern Airlines

T-8

National Airlines

T-26

United Airlines

T-2

Delta

T-13

Baniff

T-19

Consolidated Freight Ways

T-17

(* AT & T which is a subsidiary of British Telecom owned by Rothschilds, owns Sprint, and MCI)

( ** Ranking in Transportation Industry)

Freeport Sulphur

International basic Economy Corporation

Bank trusts holdings are a unique feature. Banks hold commercial corporations stock in trust accounts for their clients. Most of the times these clients are not disclosed and they give proxy voting rights to the banks regarding their stock holdings. Chase trust department along with its companion Investment Management Corporation controls single largest block of stock in the following corporations.

United Airlines (One of the planes used in Bombing on Sep 11)

Northwest Airlines

Long Island Lighting

Atlantic Richfield Oil (Enron is one of its subsidiary)

National Airlines.

The following are the companies that have ties with Rockefeller group as they have interlocking directorships with them. Most of these following mentioned belong to other families. Carnegies Empire of rail roads, or Harriman’s empire of Steel.

Corporation Name

Ranking by Fortune magazine About the size of Asset Holding

Corporation Name

Ranking by Fortune magazine About the size of Asset Holding

Allied Chemical

85

Anaconda Copper

118

Dupont

17

Monsanto

43

Olin Mathison

161

Borden

47

National Distilleries

185

Shell

14

Gulf

7

Union Oil

34

Dow

27

Celanese

101

Pittsburgh Plate Glass

113

Cities Service

61

Stauffer Chemical

233

Continental Oil

16

Union Carbide

22

American Cyanamid

107

American Motors

93

Bendix

77

Chrysler

11

CIT Financial

F-9

S.S. Kresge

F-9

R.H.Macy

R-27

6. Rothschilds-Lords of Everything (Gold, Diamonds, Oil, Banking, Rail Roads, Insurance, Shipping)

In all the above houses we came across the name Rothschilds. Who are they? They are the uncrowned rulers of the ADAE, the English world, one of the main former owners of EIC and bank of England and umpteen corporations. Who are they?

According to historians it is an enigma wrapped in mythological proportions, a history untold in historical books but which is passed on generation after generation in every part of Islamic and Christian countries starting from Portugal to Russia, Morocco to Philippines (probably with exception of India). Every European noble and commoner, with awe and reverence take their name. According to economists most of the African, Arabic, Australian and Asian countries wealth, and natural resources are owned by them. According to biographers they are the uncrowned masters and lords of Europe and most of the World we live in. Virtually they own every thing in Europe except some wealth in France and Germany. Every oil field, every bank, every insurance company, every educational institute, every thing said written shown (entire media-TV, Radio, Newspapers, Publishing house) in Europe, Africa, Australia, United States of America including Reuters, AP, are either owned by them or by their associates. According to critics, catholic, protestant clerics and church organizations they are the ruthless exploiters and international merchant bankers. According to various nations’ patriotic leaders they are behind every coup, every change of every government and leader in every part of the world. But who are they?

A family unheard (or deliberately not publicized for fear of persecution by Church) until beginnings of 17th century, came from where? How it rose to such a gigantic proportions? How they achieved the glory of becoming the leaders and lords of the world in short span of 200 years? What history as told by history books (mostly owned by them) tell and do not tell? And what historical facts exist in the untold history that was omitted from the historical books and found by researchers.

According to observers of history Rothschild is neither their first name nor their family name, nor it is the title they have taken, but it became the story of ever evolving knighthood of many myths, they are the protagonist of the first worlds (post renaissance Europe) Jewish family. It is this family that out mastered Napoleon, outlived Hitler, built railroads in Europe, factories in South America, developed oilfields in Africa and Arabia, water and power generation in Canada, financed many uranium mines in world and pumped money to built tunnel under the English Channel, supported enormous philanthropies, helped to create countries, toppled dynasties, owned art collections, castles and great vineyards-and have triumphantly over come the dangers of decadence that are said to be inevitable after eight generation.[10]

They were behind destruction of every European monarchy, creation of both free trade and communism, subjugation of India and China under East India companies, exploitation of Africa via their associates, and finally believed to be the master minds behind the creation of state of Israel. They protected Jews from definite annihilation, finally brought the dream of 1000 years, the homeland for Jews with Jerusalem as its capital in 1948.

The family never allowed any biographer to write about them, yet thousands of books exist about them. Some are tacitly approved by them some are protested by them in courts and yet the books come till Rothschilds write about themselves. Till then the same tales about them will be told and retold as were done in Jewish Chronicles. All the tales start in the Jewish ghetto of Frankfurt either in 1743 or 1774, where Mayer Amschel Rothschild was born and began his life as a merchant of cloth and old coin. He became a money changer then moved from his house on whose door Red shield (in German Rot Schild later Rothschild thus their name) was painted to a larger five stories Green Shield and send his four sons to the then citadels (read kingdoms) of finance and politics in Europe. Jacob (latter became James) went to Paris-France, Salomon to Vienna-Austria, Kalmann to Naples-Italy, and finally Nathan to London-Great Britain.

Amschel stayed at home with the father in Frankfurt-Germany. The internal squabble of the European principalities and kingdoms led to frequent wars among nations in those days. When Prince William of Hesse Cassel forced to flee for the fear of Napoleon he asked M.A. Rothschild to safe guard his possessions (gold and other valuables). Rothschild accepted and sent the same to Nathan in London who invested the same in speculation and stock market and multiplied the fortune. When Prince William returned then the father gave back the fortune and interest.

In the same way the British government asked Nathan to ship gold to Duke of Wellington who was trapped in Spain through enemy lines. Nathan accepted and shipped the gold to his brother James in Paris and James smuggled the same through the enemy lines bribing local police officials and ministers to Duke of Wellington Admiral Nelson. When smuggling takes heroic proportions then it becomes main stream history. So too the financial coup of Nathan in London was told and retold many a times to become greater than history. Nathan got the advance information from his couriers in France that Napoleon was in fact defeated. Then he used a technique on the London stock exchange which other Rothschilds and their associates used on various stock markets to make a killing. Instead of buying the British shares which an average investor does, Nathan, upon the receipt of the Napoleon defeat straight went to London stock exchange and leaned against a pillar (which is now called Nathan Pillar) and asked his agents to sell the British stock. Panic spread in the market and people thought that British were defeated and every body started to sell. Within hours the London stock market crashed. Just before the close hours of market Nathan ordered his agents to buy. With out any emotion the agents obeyed and bought the entire British stock at a cut throat prices. Finally the next day the news reached about Wellington’s victory. The stock market rose sharply. The French markets collapsed. James Rothschild bought the entire French stock markets. Over night the fortunes of Rothschilds rose and the bankrupt British and French governments and other small kingdoms after Napoleonic war came kneeling for money or gold or for both to Rothschilds. From here there was no turning back. The Jewish Chronicles (encyclopedia of Jewish people) always dedicated special references to Nathan and claim that it was Nathan Rothschild who in fact defeated Emperor Napoleon not Duke of Wellington-Nelson. All brothers well established themselves in all capitals of Europe. One of the brothers James (Jacob) Rothschild in Paris was called “King of Jews” and Napoleon III even paid a state visit to him. The Rothschild houses in Vienna-Austria and Hamburg-Germany were latter destroyed and closed by Hitler during Nazi upspring during 1935-39.

How rich are they? No one knows. The English Rothschilds still own and operate via N & M Rothschild & Co, a partnership firm. According to English law partnership firms need not disclose their profits. Through a series of trusts holding companies hundreds and thousands or other major corporations were held by them. Major European banks Bank of England (now handed over to British Parliament), Barclays bank, and Standard Chartered are the ones owned by them directly or indirectly. Shell, British Petroleum, British telecom is in their orbit. All major news papers published in London and world wide the Times group, Daily Telegraph, and host of other tabloids in England, France are within their either direct or indirect control. The BBC (British Broadcasting Corporation) which is one of their main instruments of news and views propagation is within their control. The Time-Warner Group of motion picture production companies are within their orbit. Time Warner group-with all its affiliated periodicals-Time, Money, Fortune, Life, People and Sports Illustrated-is within their control. The mighty Holly Wood Film industry under Warner Brothers is under their control. The Cable News Network which is part of Time Warner Empire is under their control. The main news suppliers Reuters of England and Associated Press of France are within their control.

During first half of 18 century Rothschilds bought out various European Government loans amounting to 1,600,000,000 (1.6 Trillion) British pounds. This is only an estimate but how much interest these loans carry and how much the British government and other European governments have to pay anybody’s guess. Also they entered in to lucrative and speculative markets of foreign bond buying issued by various foreign governments as part of financing other nation’s infrastructure expansion plans.

The derivative security markets trade (dealing with the options, futures etc) by the banks associate with Rothschild and Rockefellers alone worth more than $ 360 Trillion U.S. dollars against the assets of paltry $ 300 billion dollars. It is this unknown power to most of Indians that controls the world against which independent minded nations like France Germany Russia are struggling to contain in uphill battle.

Most of the stock investing operations were done through their associates in United States of America-the house of Morgan. Morgan Stanley, Morgan-Dewitt-Stanley is the prime banking brokers in derivative market. Apart from it Kuhn & Leob, Goldman Sachs, American Express, Lehman bank are the brokerage houses that deal with personal and corporate portfolios. Merrill Lynch, Goldman Sachs are the mutual fund giants that control investment portfolios in the world.

Rupert Murdoch and his meteoric rise owes to the unlimited billions of dollars of financing offered to him by Sir Openheimer and Rothschild. With this unlimited money he bought the Star TV to control the minds of Asians, started FOX news network to control the minds of Americans, and ready to buy any thing that prints broadcasts and airs any where in the world.

Also they financed a vast majority of freedom movements within many foreign governments. Once the governments fail to repay they have two methods of recovering their debt. Either getting the unhindered authority over the natural resources of foreign governments-via loans from IMF, WB or ADB (all these banks get funding from Rockefeller and Rothschild banks), or over throwing the governments by helping ‘freedom fighters’ who in turn will open the way for the unhindered authority for developing (exploiting) natural resources of the particular country. If there is no freedom movement then their job is done by the British government it self as a matter of courtesy towards Rothschilds who financed the British government for many centuries in good and bad times (like Iraqi war). More than 200 terrorist movements world wide were linked to the philanthropies funded by Rothschilds. The League of Nations, the united nations owe their existence and constitution to the generosity of Rothschilds and their associates. The United Nations offices today stand over the land donated by Rockefellers.

MNCs and to whom they belong.

The following are the companies that entered India as part of liberalization. Now as we see they all belong to Same Rockefeller Group of companies. Meaning effectively one multinational family is controlling the Indian liberalized economy.

Bombay

Rockefeller Group

Kodak, Heinz, Monsanto, Warner Bros, Bank of America, Bankers Trust, Parke Davis, Intel, JP Morgan, Kellogg, Pfizer, Procter & Gamble, American Int'l Group, Exxon-Mobil, Delta

Probably Independent

Federal Express, Boston Consulting.

Delhi

Rockefeller Group

AT&T, GE, General Motors, Pepsi, Unocal, Xerox, Lockheed, Raytheon, AES, Alcoa, American Express, Northrop, Polaroid and Coca Cola.

Probably Independent

Oracle, Rockwell, Honeywell, Adobe, Amway, McKinsey,

Bangalore

Rockefeller Group

Dell, Texas Instruments, NCR, Hewlett Packard, Motorola, Lucent, IBM, Novell, Ingersoll-Rand, American Data and MetLife.

Probably Independent

Caterpillar, Sun,

Hyderabad

Rothschild Group

De Beers, most of bio-tech companies

Probably Independent

Microsoft, Cognizant, Chip Engines and Brigade

Chennai

Rockefeller Group

Citibank, Ernst & Young and Price Waterhouse

Independent)

Ford, Caltex, Tenneco, Covansys, Diebold,

Modern Indian Sassoons-House of Reliance

We have seen in the beginning of this section EICs gave a sort of trade monopoly to house of Sassoon during 1830-1945. If we see today the trend now is such monopoly is being granted to Reliance corporation. The collaboration of MNCs with Reliance show the same trend of EICs continuing. Once the natural resources of any country were taken over then the political governments will be as power less as grass blades being inundated with floods.

MNC

Ownership house /EIC back ground

Indian Counterpart

Product

Potential In US $

De Beers

Rothschild

Reliance

Diamonds

Billions

EXXON

Rockefeller

Reliance

Oil Natural gas

Billions

Royal Dutch Shell

Rothschild

Reliance

Oil Natural gas

Billions

Lucent/Viacom*

Rockefeller

Reliance

Telecommunications

Billions

Metlife/New York life

Rockefeller

Reliance

Insurance

Billions

* Lucent Technologies is a subsidiary of AT & T and Bell labs. AT & T is a subsidiary of British Telecom. After Sep 11, 2001, Lucent went to near bankruptcy as they produced Telephone sets in millions and cannot find a market, and inventory carrying costs of these telephone sets in warehouses is costing them too much. They dumped all those sets on India via Reliance. Now Lucent recovered to profitability. What happens to Indian telephone companies that will be bought or wiped out with the Reliance onslaught we have to see.

Now the question is why in India many do not know about these facts of gigantic family corporations. Why in this information age no information is available in India or hidden from Indians? How this remarkable feet can be achieved. All this information that we gathered is freely available in USA, Europe, Russia, and Japan and even in many Arab countries. There are public debates, outrages and protests on the above issue of control of these families, massive demonstrations done in many western cities and USA over the new globalization drive by these MNCs which was seen by one and all as old wine of EIC Global Trade in new liberalization bottle.

But why in India-the largest English speaking country out side England-this information printed in English is not available. Some Indians cannot speak even their own mother tongue or any other European languages with such fluency as they can speak English.

The answer lies in the media control-print, television, radio- exercised by the above industrial houses and their own multinationals. Before we go in to the next part of Multinationals and Media abuses using the radio, television and print media we first has to destroy the myth of India being the largest, best English speaking population out side England.

Let us assume that 10% of the total Indian population read write and converse in English (I know that this is an erroneous assumption-the actual figure may be close to 3 or 4 percent. We need a through study on this topic any way.) This brings us the total number of English speaking people in India to 10 crores or 100 millions.

Let us take Japan. A nation of 15 Crores population. They hate to speak English or any other European language. They are the second largest Economy in the world. Their official language is only Japanese. Except in international airport it is hard to see English on any of their bill boards or inner cities. They never allowed any MNCs or EICs to trade with them either in 1542 or in 2002, but still they are the best industrialized nation in the world. They never sold their domestic companies to any MNCs for foreign capital but still their standard of living is higher than America. Any body who want to do business with Japan has to learn Japanese with out which one has to hire a translator to help in negotiations.

The beauty is 94% Japanese (or 14 crores or 140 millions) can speak excellent English (read write and speak)[11]. Apart from English, majority of Japanese speak fluently Dutch, French, German, Russian, and Spanish but still insist others speak only Japanese when dealing with Japan. The same trend was and is followed by all Asian giants that achieved the remarkable development in the past 20 years. They never ‘sold’ their natural resources for development for EICs turned MNCs which exploited them. But they developed indigenous ways of development based on their cultural values to compete and prosper.

So the myth of development only with liberalization, privatization, British US models of economy is farce and destructive.

NOTE TO READERS: According to Israeli economic attaché lecture in Hyderabad during his December 2003 visit, since last three years we are exporting $ 450 million dollars worth of Diamonds to Israel alone. He predicted that the diamond exports to Israel alone can reach within two years $ 1 billion dollars. Other experts are projecting a close to $ 100 billion diamond exports (equivalent to the whole Indian national debt of 50 years) in 5 years, surpassing every other export commodity. This mineral wealth is concentrated on the east coast of India starting from Orissa, through Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka and to the southern tip of Tamil Nadu. Is there any relation between the discovery of diamond mineral wealth by a foreign MNCs and anti agricultural practices by all the four state governments, and subsequent destruction of agriculture in these areas for the last 8 years which is forcing farmers to sell their lands? With out knowing what is under their farms which may be thousands of times worth than selling the lands, farmers are selling their destroyed agrarian lands and moving to Cities. Also is there a relation over the increased communist terrorist activities in all these four states and the foreign based companies operating in these areas? Are not Indians capable of mining and exporting these diamonds?

Can some body figure out how come after 50 years a private monopoly corporation can figure out such huge diamond mines with out coming to India using only three dimensional laser satellite photography, where as Government of India, 4 most intelligent state governments and their entire retinue of geologists, gemologists never ever figured out this national wealth which was summarily handed over to De Beers and associates by all four State Governments with the tacit approval of Central Government.

Oh my dear brothers and sisters awake with eyes open arise with awareness, learn the facts stranger than fiction to prosper and develop. Other wise you are for ever slaves to various masters.

The following is a good exercise for readers to find on their own as to what is the status in the following sectors. We are in information age and it is a good way to know how much information available any where on these corporations.

Exercise:-1. Find how many of the Sassoon’s Companies still operative in India, and who owns them.

Exercise:-2. Find which are the other current industrial houses in India that are collaborating with these MNCs. Why MNCs are choosing these industrial houses only.

Exercise:-3. Find in what other infrastructure areas Reliance is venturing, Steel, Cement etc

Exercise:-4. De Beers and its associates within India. Dwyka Diamonds of Australia that was operating India its relationship with De Beers.

[1] Esso is a short form of S.O. or Standard Oil. The very name Standard Oil sends a negative image among many Americans as this company exploited poor Americans for more than a century before it was broken up in the year 1911. From then the parent company uses a name ‘esso’ to indicate the abbreviations of S.O-Standard Oil. When the company was broken up it formed few smaller companies among which EXXON is one.

[2] See the part on China-Mercenary of International bankers in Asia.

[3] Refer below for the creation of UN and development of UN to promote Global Economic Agenda.

[4] Brmingham Stephen, The Grandees: America’s Sephardic Elite, Harper & Row, NY.,1971 pp3.

[5] Garry Allen, Rockefeller-Campaigning for New World Order (Belmont, MA, American Opinion, 1974, p 15.

[6] The Rockefeller File, “76 Press, Seal Beach, California, 1976, pp27-28.

[7] Ibid.

[8] Knowles James, “The Rockefeller Financial Group” MSS Modular Publications, NY, 1973, p 8.

[9] Garry Allen, Ibid pp29.

[10] The Merchant bankers, Joseph Wechberg, Little Brown Company, 1977.

[11] Japanese Consulate-US replied our research team regarding the awareness of English speaking among Japanese recently

No comments:

Post a Comment